claimtruth wrote:For what it's worth, I would be against religion being taught in school. I agree that if parents want their kids to learn more about Christianity, then Sunday school class and church is the appropriate place for that, or private Christian schools(unfortunately that is an expensive choice). I don't think anyone's child should be subjected to learning religion or Bible verses in public schools. But I also disagree that the mention of Christianity and the facts associated with the history of it should be kept out of text books. Maybe I just misunderstand what is being proposed?
Does your understanding include the dilution, and omission of the importance of the works and words of Thomas Jefferson? After all, what did Thomas Jefferson ever do for the United States of America? .. He signed the Constitution, but hell, who didn't? He penned the Declaration of Independence, but hell, anyone could have done that. He's quoted as one of the most influential men in the founding of our nation, but it really could have been anyone anyway.
The problem I have with the inclusion of religion in kids educations boils down to 2 things:
1.) Christian Fundamentalists aren't looking for inclusion. They are re-writing history to suit their arguments which will inevitably lead to the establishment of a "National Religion." Congratulations, your religious rights circumvent the rights of anyone who doesn't believe the way you do, simply because you're a member of the team.. And all you have to do is just give up all pretense of self, thought, rationality, and education... and so do our kids.
2.) When the dust settles and Thomas Jefferson doesn't exist, and anyone else who isn't or wasn't a Christian is diluted and stripped from the pages of history... Which particular flavor of Christianity are we going to indoctrinate the kids of our nation with? Have the Christians thought this far ahead? Will we be playing with rattlesnakes? Will our kids be eating unleavened bread and wine for lunch? Will idolatry in the name of Catholicism be the game of the day? Will we teach our kids that we're all going to hell anyway, but in the meantime there will be no dance, no music, no pants for girls? Hellfire and brimstone instead of Science and Technology? Will "Tongues As A Second Language" be an elective? How about the "Holy Sword" in gym?
The problem is, CT, the idiots who are making the changes don't care what I think. They also don't care what you think. Everything that you just outlined that you are against, they are for, and this is apparent in every press release concerning this particular issue. You started your reply by saying I shouldn't be angry. CT, you SHOULD be angry.
The radical christian position in this debate, fight, war, is to CHANGE HISTORY. Congratulations to the folks who love their freedoms so much that they are willing to depose the freedoms of others in order to maintain and expand their own. Our nation was _not_ founded on Christianity. There is no documentation ANYWHERE to support this theory. Well, at least there wasn't.. Until Thomas Jefferson was cut from curriculum and history has been completely, and I meant COMPLETELY changed.
Where's the harm in just adding some mention of christianity into the textbooks? None! If it were factual to what really transpired, but these groups aren't looking for facts. They are looking to CHANGE facts to suit their position. This is highly irresponsible, dangerous, vile, and hurtful activity.
Given the opportunity, I would spit in the face of every single member on the board who has pushed for these changes. They are not friends. They are not good people. They aren't even good Christians. They aren't holy or spiritual at all. These are evil people with evil agendas, and they have the Christian Republican base following in lock-step.
How can people who profess to be so good, and so moral be so evil? How??
A side note...my son came home from school Wednesday and told me that a student in his human geography class was made to sit in the hall because while the teacher was discussing evolution, he raised his hand and said he believed that animals and people were created and that evolution wasn't real. I asked my son if the student was being disrespectful to the teacher and he said not at all, that he just raised his hand and quietly made the statement and the teacher sent him out in the hall.
Poor kid. While it doesn't really matter because the christian fundamentalists are winning, I would say the kid was out of his element. He needed to be in special classes, not the hallway. The damage that his parents and religion have done to his ability to learn, accept, and retain scientific information is astounding. Perhaps he aspires to be an evangelist, in which case, the point of education is moot.
The sympathy I have for this kid is for the mental and educational abuse that he's received at the hands of his parents and church. Not being told to leave so that the teacher wouldn't have to debate with a religious nutjob what was already in curriculum and is presented as a theory. It's the Theory of Evolution, not the Fact of Evolution, but I tell ya.. this theory has a lot more scientific foundation and evidence than "Suddenly *poof!* There were like, people, and animals, and clouds, and mountains and s***, and this invisible, all powerful force (who choses to not be known or shown) did it all with his miiiiind, man! HIS MIND!!!! HOLY s***, MAAAAAAAAAN!"
I feel for the teacher too. I could imagine that in the midst of a lecture that's taken me however long to prepare, after getting the class settled down, and into the lecture that I wouldn't have a lot of patience for this kid either. Christians, by and large, are impossible to convince of anything that's not fantastic. If it can't walk on water, if it isn't magically apparent, or if it has any foundation in anything other than faith, it's a lost cause to debate. I would have asked the kid to leave too, but I would have taken it further than that. I would have given him an assignment not in anyway related to evolution to do out in the hallway, and in my own time I would write up a disclaimer/permission slip for the student to take home to the parents outlining my intentions of speaking on a subject that they may not agree with, and require that signature before said student would be allowed to attend my lecture. By the way, if he didn't and it was all for a grade, I'd fail him faster than fast.
Is there really a polite way to say, "Pardon me, teach, but everything you're telling us right now, I consider to be complete and utter bull****. So..." What exactly would you have had the teacher do? Change the lesson on the fly to better suit the religious flavor of this one student? And if there's such a majority, why was this student alone in their protest? This kid belongs in a special school where his parents and religious leaders can abuse him without the real world getting in the way.
I hope beyond hope that somehow these people grow a brain before May. I don't, however, have faith that they will.